-
a [[place]].
- #pull [[elinor ostrom]]
-
alternatively, a [[device]].
- The [[Agora of Flancia]] is a [[knowledge commons]].
- #go https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commons
- In all matters pertaining the Commons I consider [[doubleloop]] ~ [[@neil]] the steward of this Agora.
- The following picks from his notes below:
- "beyond [[market]] and [[state]]"
- I sometimes think of them as [[embedding]] and thus potentially [[regulating]] markets.
- recommended [[free, fair and alive]], it's great. from his notes below:
- [[commons]] are [[social organisms]], [[social systems]], [[social forms]]
- a [[commons]] is not only about [[sharing]] but about creating [[systems]] that produce [[shareable things]]
- they enable [[self organized problem solving]]
- through social processes that build on the sharing of knowledge and physical resources
- they are [[spaces]] that are born out of the impulse to [[help others]]
- they bring together solutions to social, political and economic challenges into an integrated whole
- [[pull]] [[commoning]] [[ontology]]
-
[[vera]] (from wiki below)
- "The commons is the cultural and natural [[resources]] [[accessible to all]] members of a society, including natural materials such as air, water, and a habitable earth. These resources are held in common, [[not owned privately]]."
- [[pragmatix]]
- [[garrett hardin]]
- [[1968]] [[the tragedy of the commons]]
- [[1833]] [[william forster lloyd]] herders overusing land
- [[tragedy of the fishers]]
- [[frank van laerhoven]] and [[elinor ostrom]]: Hardin essentially invented the term commons
- of course Ostrom's work shows there are ways to avert this tragedy all around us
- in Britain, land [[enclosure]] worked over centuries to erode the commons
- [[peter barnes]] [[sky trust]]
- [[notable theoreists]] list is a banger
- [[contemporary commons movements]] too
- [[there is no commons without commoning]]
- [[international journal of the commons]]
- #pull [[frontiers of commoning]]
- a [[list]].
Commons
[[I like commons]].
In a nutshell: 'a commons' is a shared thing between a bunch of people that they actively maintain together.
The idea is that they are "beyond market and state".
Commons can be found in all kinds of walks of life - the environment (grazing lands, fisheries, community forests), culture, digital realm, knowledge commons.
There's a lot to unpack. My favourite book on commons and commoning is [[Free, Fair and Alive]].
The logic of the commons is the logic of a common humanity that has realized that all humans should be equal participants and beneficiaries in society (see Dyer-Witheford 1999, 2007, 2009; Fuchs 2011b; Hardt and Negri 2009; Ε½iΕΎek 2010).
What is a commons?
Also what's the difference between 'the Commons' and 'a commons'?
The Commons is a means of provisioning and governance that generally doesn't need the permission of legislatures or courts to move forward.
β [[David Bollier]], [[Stir to Action]] Issue 30
The commons are cared for by the those that directly inhabit and gain from its wealth.
β [[Seeding the Wild]]
Despite vivid differences among commons focused on natural resources, digital systems, and social mutuality, they all share structural and social similarities.
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
So instead of conceiving of commons as closed systems of common property managed by a βclub,β it is more productive to see them as social organisms who, thanks to their [[semi-permeable membrane]]s, can interact with larger forces of life β communities, ecosystems, other commons.
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
The commons is not simply about βsharing,β as it happens in countless areas of life. It is about sharing and bringing into being durable social systems for producing shareable things and activities.
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
Commons are living social systems through which people address their shared problems in self-organized ways.
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
The commons is a robust class of self-organized social practices for meeting needs in fair, inclusive ways.
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
Each commons depends on social processes, the sharing of knowledge, and physical resources. Each shares challenges in bringing together the social, the political (governance), and the economic (provisioning) into an integrated whole.
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
The elemental human impulse that we are born with β to help others, to improve existing practices β ripens into a stable social form with countless variations: a commons.
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
How big is a commons?
In a commons, the resource can be small and serve a tiny group (the family refrigerator), it can be community-level (sidewalks, playgrounds, libraries, and so on), or it can extend to international and global levels (deep seas, the atmosphere, the Internet, and scientific knowledge).
The commons can be well bounded (a community park or library); transboundary (the Danube River, migrating wildlife, the Internet); or without clear boundaries (knowledge, the ozone layer).
Why?
the commons is not just about small-scale projects for improving everyday life. It is a germinal vision for reimagining our future together and reinventing social organization, economics, infrastructure, politics, and state power itself.
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
The commons is a social form that enables people to enjoy freedom without repressing others, enact fairness without bureaucratic control, foster togetherness without compulsion, and assert sovereignty without nationalism.
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
A commons β¦ gives community life a clear focus. It depends on democracy in its truest form. It destroys inequality. It provides an incentive to protect the living world. It creates, in sum, a politics of belonging.β
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
The virtue of the commons as a mode of thought and action isnβt simply that it provides for the scaled management of pooled resources, but that it spurs us to envision a way of life founded in interdependence, mutuality and shared responsibility for the outcomes experienced by others. Any situation organized in this way offers us a way to get outside of ourselves, a scaffolding for the development of intersubjectivity.
β [[Radical Technologies]]
Where market logics generally seek to collectivize risk and privatize gain, adherents to the principles of the commons believe that the greatest degree of sustainable benefit is derived from resources when they are held jointly, and managed democratically for the good of all.
β [[Radical Technologies]]
Politics of it
The world of commoning represents a profound challenge to capitalism because it is based on a very different ontology.
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
Difficulties for commons
Potential problems in the use, governance, and sustainability of a commons can be caused by some characteristic human behaviors that lead to social dilemmas such as competition for use, free riding, and over- harvesting. Typical threats to knowledge commons are commodification or enclosure, pollution and degradation, and nonsustainability.
Related
-
#push [[Commons]]
- [[Beyond Markdown on Git]]
-
[[FOTL]]
- present to FOTL on a vision for the [[Knowledge Commons]]
-
#push [[commons]]
- [[data union]]
commoning
The stuff [[commoner]]s do to enjoy, curate and steward a [[commons]].
[[commoner]]s are engaged in in "world-making in a [[pluriverse]]" because that phrase captures the core purpose of commoning: the creation of peer-generated, context-specific systems for free, fair and sustainable lives.
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
commoning is primarily about creating and maintaining relationships - among people in small and big communities and networks, between humans and the nonhuman world, and between us and past and future generations.
β [[Free, Fair and Alive]]
See the [[Spheres of commoning]].
Elinor Ostrom
-
a [[person]]
- [[political economist]]
-
feels like a [[friend]] (when I esteem myself).
- I sometimes think of this Agora, hopefully not disrespectfully, as the [[agora lin ostrom]].
- #pull [[lin ostrom]]
- [[wp]] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elinor_Ostrom
- https://twitter.com/flancian/status/1368583582277570560
- [[books]]
Elinor Ostrom
- https://doubleloop.net/?s=ostrom
- [[Elinor Ostrom's Rules for Radicals]]: Cooperative alternatives beyond markets and states
a resource arrangement that works in practice can work in theory
^ In a very small nutshell that sums up Ostrom's huge contribution to the commons.
Building on Ostrom
Ostrom worked from the perspective of the rational-actor school of economics and a focus on resource management at small scales. So she worked within a limited analytic framework and did not engage with political economy.
β [[David Bollier, P2P Models interview on digital commons]]
To the extent that Ostrom and many other commentators, economists, and politicians focus on the Commons as chiefly a resource, it shifts attention to social and political questions of how a Commons organises itself into the background. It adopts the standard rational actor frame of Homo economicus and puts into the background the contestable, negotiable, circumstantial ways in which social governance emerges.
β [[David Bollier, P2P Models interview on digital commons]]
una grande
Frontiers of Commoning
URL : https://david-bollier.simplecast.com/
A : [[podcast series]]
Hosted by : [[David Bollier]]
- a branch of [[philosophy]].
- a branch of [[information science]].
Ontology is the knowledge of relations between subjects.
= [[2022-03-23]] on [[matrix]] I once published a review of most common categorization systems in Russian:
I found 7 different types of such systems
In short, translated:
#tags like this, one might call them hashtags Metatags? Classic wiki categories Forward indices Hierarchy Map of content None I didn't find any more categorization systems. Everything is a mixture between the seven
There's no distinction between linking to the topic and inclusion in the topic with the link+backlink combo
Ontology
- public document at doc.anagora.org/commons
- video call at meet.jit.si/commons
17
2020 07 26
2021 05 13
2021 05 15
2021 05 16
2021 06 06
2021 06 19
2021 09 05
2021 10 31
2021 12 27
2021 12 28
2021 12 29
2021 12 30
2022 01 01
2022 01 06
2022 01 09
2022 01 11
2022 01 17
2022 01 20
2022 01 29
2022 03 27
2022 04 30
2022 05 08
2022 05 22
2022 08 08
2022 08 09
2022 08 20
2022 09 08
2022 09 10
2022 09 29
2022 11 26
2022 12 04
2022 12 07
2022 12 12
2022 12 17
2022 12 26
2022 12 27
2023 01 15
2023 01 29
2023 02 19
2023 05 26
2023 08 14
2023 09 17
2023 10 14
2024 01 05
8 principles for managing a commons
a commons is a politics of belonging
a platform designed for collaboration federated wiki
agora
agora paper
agora pkg chapter
agora protocol
agora slides 2023
arghzero
bag of holding
commoning
commons based internet
community land trusts
comparing market state and commons
compost
david bollier
digital commons
digital gardener taxonomy
discussing social annotation and digital literacies
distributed cooperative organisation
ecosocialism
elinor ostroms rules for radicals
enclosure of the commons
federated wiki
federation
flancia
flancians
food commons
free fair and alive
free knowledge commons
future histories
generativist
goteo
i like the commons
identity
imperialism is the arsonist marxisms contribution to ecological literatures and struggles
in flancia there is an agora
index
inserting wikilinks into quotes
institutional analysis and development
jackson rising
kate raworth on why our times demand doughnut economics
kindly
knowledge commons
mathew lowry
metasj
moloch
murray bookchin
nathan schneider cooperatives the commons and ownership
new forest
node
numbers
open letter to moloch
p2p accounting for planetary survival
public utilities
silke helfrich
silke helfrich david bollier what is the commons
simple
singular plural
social transformation through the commons
sovereignty for the commons
stoa
tasshin
teia dos povos
the agora is a social knowledge graph
the care manifesto
the internet as a super commons
the stack as an integrative model of global capitalism
this land is our land
tools for thinking
towards a knowledge commons
trip 35 the internet
tΓΆrbel
value flows
venture communism
well connected
what about nazis
what is the relationship between cooperatives and the commons
what we choose to do with the internet
1833
1968
@neil
a re commonification of welfare systems
accessible to all
agora of flancia
an agora
commoning
commons
commons based peer production
contemporary commons movements
david bollier
device
doubleloop
elinor ostrom
embedding
enclosure
frank van laerhoven
free fair and alive
frontiers of commoning
garrett hardin
help others
i like commons
international journal of the commons
knowledge commons
list
market
not owned privately
notable theoreists
ontology
peter barnes
place
pragmatix
pull
radical technologies
regulating
resources
seeding the wild
self organized problem solving
semi permeable membrane
shareable things
sharing
sky trust
social forms
social media a critical introduction
social organisms
social systems
spaces
state
stir to action
stoa
systems
the tragedy of the commons
there is no commons without commoning
tragedy of the fishers
understanding knowledge as a commons
vera
william forster lloyd