📚 node [[decentralisation]]
Decentralisation
#+ROAMALIAS "Decentralization"
Decentralisation can apply to lots of things.
As Vitalik Buterin once layed out, it helps to see decentralisation as having multiple dimensions, in his view these three: technical, political, and logical. A technically decentralised network with a single developer influencing its progress is politically centralised. And if all nodes have to share the same data (the modus operandi of blockchains) it is logically centralised.
I see the purpose as reducing imbalances of authority and power, as much as is possible.
I guess I'm most interested currently in how it applies politically and technologically.
[[Technological decentralisation]]
Political decentralisation
[[Anarchism]].
Decentralised organisataions
Interesting diagram of control vs structure
https://twitter.com/seldo/status/1486563446099300359 /photo/1
📖 stoas
- public document at doc.anagora.org/decentralisation
- video call at meet.jit.si/decentralisation
⥱ context
← back
2021 06 13
decentralised futures
evolutionary and adaptive systems
infinite detail
internet
introduction to complexity
review future histories
the reboot
towards a liberatory technology
web 3 0
2021 06 13
decentralised futures
evolutionary and adaptive systems
infinite detail
internet
introduction to complexity
review future histories
the reboot
towards a liberatory technology
web 3 0
↑ pushing here
(none)
(none)
↓ pulling this
(none)
(none)
⥅ related node [[technological decentralisation]]
🔎 full text search for 'decentralisation'