📚 node [[tit for tat with forgiveness]]
tit for tat with forgiveness
-
a [[strategy]]
-
[[tit for tat]] is optimal in many scenarios
- plus [[forgiving]]
- [[pull]] [[robert axelrod]]
-
[[tit for tat]] is optimal in many scenarios
tit for tat with forgiveness
"Tit for Tat with forgiveness" is sometimes superior. When the opponent defects, on the next move, the player sometimes cooperates anyway, with a small probability (around 1%-5%). This allows for occasional recovery from getting trapped in a cycle of defections. The exact probability depends on the line-up of opponents. "Tit for Tat with forgiveness" is best when miscommunication is introduced to the game — when one's move is incorrectly reported to the opponent.
[[tit for tat]]
⥅ node [[robert-axelrod]] pulled by user
📖 stoas
- public document at doc.anagora.org/tit-for-tat-with-forgiveness
- video call at meet.jit.si/tit-for-tat-with-forgiveness
⥱ context
↑ pushing here
(none)
(none)
↓ pulling this
(none)
(none)
🔎 full text search for 'tit for tat with forgiveness'