📚 node [[microsoft s dirty supply chain is holding back its climate ambitions]]
Welcome! Nobody has contributed anything to 'microsoft s dirty supply chain is holding back its climate ambitions' yet. You can:
  • Write something in the document below!
    • There is at least one public document in every node in the Agora. Whatever you write in it will be integrated and made available for the next visitor to read and edit.
  • Write to the Agora from social media.
    • If you follow Agora bot on a supported platform and include the wikilink [[microsoft s dirty supply chain is holding back its climate ambitions]] in a post, the Agora will link it here and optionally integrate your writing.
  • Sign up as a full Agora user.
    • As a full user you will be able to contribute your personal notes and resources directly to this knowledge commons. Some setup required :)
⥅ related node [[microsofts dirty supply chain is holding back its climate ambitions]]
⥅ node [[microsofts-dirty-supply-chain-is-holding-back-its-climate-ambitions]] pulled by Agora

Microsoft's dirty supply chain is holding back its climate ambitions

URL : https://www.theverge.com/23745933/microsoft-fossil-fuels-suppy-chain-emissions-climate

[[Microsoft]]. [[supply chains]]. [[carbon dioxide emissions]].

96.71% of Microsoft's emissions are scope 3, i.e. lifecycle emissions from products.

Emissions from many of Microsoft's suppliers have in fact been going up. Mostly, they seem to say, as a result of increase in demand.

Seems like a reduction in demand (i.e. degrowth) would be a good way to go.

The problem of [[carbon emissions]], counter to [[planetary stability]], at all layers of the stack.

📖 stoas
⥱ context