connecting the dots
While it's useful to break down ideas into fine-grained units, [[collecting the dots]], you have to connect them back together again to make sense of them. A collection of dots isn't much use (although just navigating around them can be fun).
After connecting the dots, I kind of think you need to colour the picture in, and then hang it on the wall for others to see.
Knowledge is not an accumulation of facts, nor is it even a set of facts and their relations. Facts are only rendered meaningful within narratives, and the single-page document is a format very conducive to narrative structure.
โ Open Transclude
People often get carried away when they discover the original vision of [[hypertext]], which involves a network of documents, portions of which are โ[[transcluded]]โ (included via hypertext) into one another. The implication is that readers could follow any reference and see the source materialโand granted, this would be transformative. However, thereโs a limit to the effectiveness of the knowledge network as a reading experience. โHypertext books,โ online books which are made up of an abundance of interlinked HTML pages, are mostly unpopular.
โ Open Transclude
[[Pattern recognition]].
- public document at doc.anagora.org/connecting-the-dots
- video call at meet.jit.si/connecting-the-dots
2020 04 30
building a second brain
collecting the dots
constellations
how should you structure a personal wiki
paths
(none)
(none)