With the birth of the Soviet Unionin the beginning of the 20th century, the question of left nationalismwas born: how should leftists think about race and nationality and resolve that problem?
Personally, I think given the history of the 20th century, the anarchistshave the right answer: left national projects are, for the most part, a dead end. Although a left nationalist project may lead to some short term gains, all it does in the long-run is empower the local bourgeoisie.
Breaking up imperial entities into nations makes sense to a certain extent though: the breakup of the Austro-Hungarian Empire into several entities was the correct short-term move. Similarly, it would make sense to create a Palestinian nation distinct from Israel
However, when the Soviet Union reified nationality, this ended up being simply a long road to fascism as recent history has borne out.
Is the way out a creation of a new identity? Or simply the elimination of race and nationality?
- public document at doc.anagora.org/20210620091821-is_nationalism_is_a_dead_end
- video call at meet.jit.si/20210620091821-is_nationalism_is_a_dead_end
(none)
(none)
(none)
(none)