π node [[semiotics the basics]]
Metadatos
- Autor: Daniel Chandler
- Publicado en: Semiotics. The basics
- AΓ±o de publicaciΓ³n: 2017
Dennotation and connotation
- the two parts of meaning
-
Dennotation: informational function
- definitional, literal, obvious meaning of a sign
-
Connotation: aesthetic function
- more polysemic aspect of signs
- secondary overtones that may be read into any sign, regardless of connotation
- there is no denotation without connotation
- Connotation requires knowledge of social context
- they require interpretation and thus challenge the notion of communication as decoding
- Barthes states that connotation creates the illusion of denotation, denotation os just another connotation
- Dennotation can rather be see as a naturalization process
-
Althusser states that together with dennotation we also learn dominant connotations, which position us within ideology
- connotations tend to support cultural stereotypes
- connotational frameworks are organized around key positions and equations within cultural codes, each pole aligned with a cluster of symbolic attributes
-
connotation and dennotation are not easily or neatly separated
- there is no depiction or description without an evaluative element
- there is no literal meaning, denotation simply has a broader consensus
-
connotation is looser, less conventional
- some connotations are widely recognized unconsciously
-
Barthes created a stratified model of connotation
- dennotation is the first order of signification
- connotation is the second: the denotative sign becomes the signifier of a connotative sign
- idea that dennotation is a primary meaning has been challenged by other theorists
-
Language is not neutral and transparent
- outr paradigmatic choices generate connotations
- Connotation is not purely paradigmatic, sytagmatic relations are also relevant. The way connotations are perceived depends on the context
- connotations depend more on social intersubjectivity than on individual subjectivity
- they are dynamic and subject to change
- connotational codes: pervasive patterns of connotations
- connotation is very important in the advertising discourse
Myth
-
Cultural myths help us make sense of our experiences within a culture
- they express and organize shared ways of conceptualizing phenomena within a culture
- they draw upon a 'cultural vocabulary'
-
they account for contradictions within cultures
- brand myth: a brand offers a solution to a contradiction
- Like connotation, myths belong to a higher order of signification, according to Barthes
-
the dennotative sign also becomes the signifier of the connotative sign
- in the case of myth, modes of representation which myth uses to build its own system become the signifier of mythical metalanguage- myths are the pervasive ideologies of our time
π stoas
- public document at doc.anagora.org/semiotics-the-basics
- video call at meet.jit.si/semiotics-the-basics
π full text search for 'semiotics the basics'