📚 node [[on the genealogy of morals excerpts]]

On the Genealogy of Morality. Excerpts

  • by [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]
  • Preface:
    • 1:
      • We are unknown to ourselves
      • Humans are concerned with knowledge, how about experience?
      • we remain strange to ourselves out of necessity, we are not knowers when it comes to ourselves
    • 2:
      • This polemic is about the descent of our moral prejudices
      • the same polemic occupied Nietzsche in Human, All Too Human
      • because these ideas have not faded but grown, Nietzsche is sure that they are stemming from a fundamental will to knowledge which excedes him. This is correct, because philosophers must not stand out individually in their quest for knowledge
    • 3:
      • origin of terms good and evil, a curiosity that stems from skepticism
      • first hypothesis: the origin is God
      • but later the author ceased to search the origin of evil beyond the world
      • he then focused on the value judgments good and evil, and how was it that man came up with them, and what do they mean for humanity
    • 4:
      • genealogy of hypotheses: The Origin of the Moral Sensations by Dr. Paul RÊe, "refuted" by Nietzsche in Human...
  • 5:
    • Value of morality: necessary confrontation with Schopenhauer
      • values of unegoistic, compassion, self-denial, self-sacrifice held by Schopenhauer, mistrusted by Nietzsche
      • here Nietzsche sees the danger to mankind
      • a predilection for compassion in philosophers is something new, belonging to modern philosophers, until now, philosophers have deemed compassion worthless
    • 6:
      • because of this modern emergence, a critique of moral values is also needed, the value of those values must be examined
      • how did these values grow, develop and change? the value of these values has been taken for grantes
      • Nietzsche wonders if placing the higher value on good has hindered humanity in some way we are unaware of
    • 7:
      • focus on a history of morality
      • the problem of morality must be first taken seriously so that it can eventually be taken humorously
    • first essay:
      • I
          • the highest caste is the clerical caste: psychological and political superiority are taken as equal
          • pure and impure are taken too seriously
          • Nietzsche considers this dominancy unhealthy: customs
          • the priestly method split off from the chilvaric-aristocratic method and develop further into its opposite
          • priests are the most evil enemies: powerlessness
          • the Jews have been the ones to harm the noble, mighty, rulers, the most
          • the slaves' revolt in morality begins with the Jews, and it was victorious
          • from this revenge, a love grew out: Jesus, perfect and dangerous bait
          • with this, the morality of the common people has triumphed
          • role of Church?
          • slaves' revolt in morality originates when ressentiment turns creative and gives birth to values
          • noble morality grows out of affirmation of itself, but slave morality is the negation of everything that is outside. This means no creativity.
          • Change of focus from inside to outside is a feature of ressentiment. Ressentiment is a reaction to the outside
          • so does the man of ressentiment conceive the evil enemy, as a figure of which he is the counterpart
      • II
        • 11
          • instead, a noble man conceives the idea of good by himself, and only then creates a notion of bad
          • the bad conceived by the noble and the evil conceived by the man of ressentiment are very different from each other
          • evil according to ressentiment is the good person from the nobility, re-interpreted through the filter of ressentiment
      • 12 - the destinty of Europe seems in danger because we have lost fear of man, and with it our love and respect for him - It seems that things will continue to declin
      • 16
        • the battle between good and bad and good and evil has been going on for thousands of years, and there are places in which this battle is still going
        • Rome versus Judea: Rome, strong and noble, Judea, ressentiment and popular morality
          • of these models, Rome has been defeated
          • Judea: Church - Reformation - Restoration of the Church - French revolution and its annihilation of the last political nobility in Europe
        • 17
          • need for an exchange between philosophy, phisiology and medicine
          • values must be reassessed, starting from a physiological standpoint. The rank order of values must be decided taking these other standpoints into account.
  • second essay - 9 - community and its members have a relationship akin to that between the creditor and the debtor - if you do not comply with the obligations that living in a community entails, you will be in debt and will be made to make up for it. - the law breaker is deprived of the benefits of living in a community and also reminded of how important the benefits are - punishment in this sense is a copy of the behavior towards a hated defeated enemy - 10 - when a community grows in power the actions of a wrongdoer are no longer so destabilizing wo there is no need to punish them harshly, instead, they are shielded - a compromise is sought: mercy - 11 - recent attempts to seek the origin of justice in ressentiment (anarchists / anti-Semites) - attempts to sanctify revenge with justice / legitimization of emotional reactions through revenge - Nietzsche criticizes that other emotions that he calls "active"(such as lust for mastery or greed) are not considered so generously by these points of view - in his view, justice represents not ressentiment, a reaction, but the battle against that kind of sentiment - however, the setting up of a legal system starts the values of "just" and "unjust", which are not found "as such" in life, since life functions in a destructive and violent manner - states of legality are exceptional states that seek to restrict the true will to life - 12 - origin and purpose of punishment - these matters should be considered separately - punishment has not been evolved for punishing - the development of something is not a progress towards a goal, instead a succession of processes of subjugation exacted on the thing - progress can be measured according to how much had to be sacrificed for it - the essence of life, its will to power, is often overlooked
📖 stoas
âĨą context