adversarial interoperability
“That’s when you create a new product or service that plugs into the existing ones without the permission of the companies that make them,” writes [[Cory Doctorow]], special advisor to the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
– Breaking Tech Open: Why Social Platforms Should Work More Like Email - The Re…
“Think of third-party printer ink, alternative app stores, or independent repair shops that use compatible parts from rival manufacturers to fix your car or your phone or your tractor.”
– Breaking Tech Open: Why Social Platforms Should Work More Like Email - The Re…
Without adversarial interoperability, users have limited [[agency]] and innovation is stifled.
– Breaking Tech Open: Why Social Platforms Should Work More Like Email - The Re…
The writer Cory Doctorow talks about “adversarial interoperability,” which describes a situation where one service communicates with another without the latter’s permission, or perhaps only with grudging permission secured through legislation.
– [[Internet for the People]]
For most of modern history, this kind of guerrilla interoperability, achieved through reverse engineering, bots, scraping and other permissionless tactics, were the norm. But a growing thicket of “IP” laws creates severe legal jeopardy for these time-honored traditions. Just one of these IP rules — the “anti-circumvention” provision in Section 1201 of 1998’s Digital Millennium Copyright Act — provides for a five-year prison sentence and a $500,000 fine for anyone who bypasses “an effective means of access control.” And that’s for a first offense!
- public document at doc.anagora.org/adversarial-interoperability
- video call at meet.jit.si/adversarial-interoperability