📕 subnode [[@houshuang/e automatic mailing list for incremental brainstorming]]
in 📚 node [[e-automatic-mailing-list-for-incremental-brainstorming]]
- #public
- An approach to implement [[E: Incremental Brainstorming]]
-
- E: Automatic mailing list for incremental brainstorming #E #p - In the meantime, I've been thinking about something very regular, small granularity, but accretive... - Like going into my Instapaper inbox every morning and spending 10 minutes processing one or two articles, adding a few links, maybe making an SRS question... - **Some kind of idea of "batting back and forth" on a topic. A bit like postal chess - seeing one move and making one move... ** - What does it mean to "make a move" in argumentation/exploration? - Like someone asking a question or postulating something (How can we have more meaningful online parties), and the other one making one rhetorical move... Maybe "What do you mean by meaningful" - and back and forth... limited to one question/answer per day? - But then somehow mapped out so it's not just a long iMessage thread... - Is there a way in which it can both provide real insight after a while, but still not get so complex that you need to spend 30 minutes to "load" the entire context, before you can make your move? - I've thought about stuff like a concept map paired with quick voice messages or something... Different ways of mapping, visualizing. A good friend of mine worked a lot with scaffolds when we did collaborative learning - UIs that encourage students to use certain words or phrases like "this cannot explain..." Found this link which briefly explains https://blogs.otago.ac.nz/ouassa/2018/02/15/why-knowledge-forum-some-tips-on-use-of-the-scaffolds/
📖 stoas
- public document at doc.anagora.org/e-automatic-mailing-list-for-incremental-brainstorming
- video call at meet.jit.si/e-automatic-mailing-list-for-incremental-brainstorming
⥱ context
To see links, go up to full node [[e-automatic-mailing-list-for-incremental-brainstorming]].