# Complexity Science and Commoning This is a section in [[Free, Fair and Alive]]. I personally am very interested in the intersection of [[complexity science]] and [[commoning]]. > **Complexity science has important things to say about the commons, too, because it sees the world as a dynamic, evolving set of living, integrated systems.** > > – [[Free, Fair and Alive]] They both have a focus on the **relationships** between things, not just the things themselves. > a shift towards a [[relational ontology]] has created a new paradigm of discovery, [[complexity science]], which is revolutionizing biology, chemistry, evolutionary sciences, physics, economics, and social sciences, among other fields. > > – [[Free, Fair and Alive]] [[Doughnut Economics]] includes this relational ontology in a framework for ecomonics. > Kate Raworth, in her brilliant book Doughnut Economics, has proposed a real-world economic framework that recognizes a new ontology — that people are social and relational (not rational and individualistic); that the world is dynamically complex (not mechanical and tending toward equilibrium); and that our economic systems must be regenerative by design. > > – [[Free, Fair and Alive]] > By viewing the world through this window — a relational ontology that moves beyond mechanical metaphors and individualism — it becomes possible to offer much better explanations for all sorts of human and ecological phenomena. > > – [[Free, Fair and Alive]] > We can begin to understand a commons as a _life-form_, not as a "resource," and as an organic, integrated system, not a collection of discrete parts. > > – [[Free, Fair and Alive]] Yes I like this. The commons as a complex system and as a life-form that persists. One can then see how things such as [[homeostasis]] and [[autopoesis]] apply to it. I think this is where [[Andreas Weber]] takes things. > The window on reality that a commons expresses is more encompassing and real (in our estimation!) than ontologies that consign relational dynamics to the background as “exogenous variables.” > > – [[Free, Fair and Alive]] > The philosopher and biologist [[Andreas Weber]] has expressed the view of being that we take in this book: "The world is not populated by singular, autonomous, sovereign beings. It is comprised of a constantly oscillating network of dynamic interactions in which one thing changes through the change of another. The relationship counts, not the substance." > > – [[Free, Fair and Alive]]