We have a minimal workable prototype in daily use  by
@gien@stopresetgo.org,we call IndyLab.
As you are aware IndyLab nee IndyWiki shares all of the goals of anagora, except it is WebNative, hostless, no server. 
We whishr to interoperate with anagora. Think of IndyLab as a Sidecar to Anagora offering zero friction provenancial access to content/conversations within Anagora with the ability to take part in the discussion eventually from the comfort of each participant's own tools for thought/wiki.
It could also facilitate onboarding into tools/wikis that make the small adjustment needed to call  what I just called
'inter web intents'
supported by IndyHub powering IndyLab.

For that purpose I would like to propose to turn this document into an IndyLab with initial members/content appearing on this page.
That would allow conversations within the Agora community to be continuous without being synchronous yet each participant would own their interactions. It would also provide access to affordances that can only be provided on a server.

Viewed from this perspective IndyLab is positioned as a webnative inter wiki/inter tools for thoughts that are born multiplayer, where the 'Player' the individual's personal digital autonomy and the their ability to be their own(ed) hub and weave their own(ed) personal networks
is guaranteed by architecture.

Hypothesis integration is already built into IndyLab,
meaning that annotations can act as portal's to conversation
much like you do with wiki links in annotations

Hi! Thank you so much for the proposal!

I like the idea of

1. developing interop indylab-anagora as an exercising of defining and refining Agora Protocol
2. moving to a platform that supports web annotations fully, or improving Docs (maybe through extensions) for it to work well in this ecosystem.

But I also want to be mindful of inclusiveness, in particular as it relates to familiarity with tools like Docs of potential collaborators. Happy to discuss further here, over VC or in the Agora!